Tuxera NTFS could not mount /dev/disck2s1 at /Volumes/New Volume. Have you checked your drive with chkdsk in Windows, following the. 'Tuxera NTFS could not mount /dev/disk1s1 at /Volumes/Elements. Is bad is that my external disk is not even visible after installing ntfs-3g. As for ubuntu, it does not mount at all. The same problem. So i now ran this ntfsfix. It made all corrections. After 'ntfs partition /dev/sdb1 was processed successfully' it is now mounting.:). But the problem is speed. Still 200 kbps – MycrofD May 28 '16 at 7:40. Jun 20, 2012 If you are using a Mac, first mount the.iso. Insert the blank CD/DVD, open Disk Utility, and select the.iso from the left-hand disc list. From the DU menu, select New - Disk Image. Choose to format the disk image as DVD/CD Master, name the disk image, and click Save. Yum applies only to Redhat systems, compile and install for all Linux distributions 3.2 mount NTFS file system. Assuming your NTFS file system is/DEV/SDB1 and you will mount it in/MNT/WINDOWS/C, follow these steps. Creates a mount point. (general recommendations are attached in the MNT directory) Mkdir/mnt/windows/c Mount NTFS partitions.
View unanswered posts | View active topics
It is currently Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:58
Tuxera NTFS could not mount (on OS X)
Moderator: unsound
Page 1 of 1
[ 12 posts ]
Previous topic | Next topic
Author
Message
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 13:34 Posts: 6
Tuxera NTFS could not mount (on OS X)
I installed ntfs-3g-2010.5.22-macosx apparently successfully. However, whenever I start the computer (a Mac running OS X 10.6.4), I get the following error message: 'Tuxera NTFS could not mount /dev/disk1s1 at /Volumes/Elements because the following problem occurred: /Library/Filesystems/fusefs.fs/Support/fusefs.kext failed to load -(libkern/kext) link error; check the system kernel logs for errors or try kextutil(8). the MacFuse file system is not available(71) _nfts_volume_release(): Inode 9 still have 1 references.' MacFuse appears to be installed. At least it appears on 'System Preferences'. What is bad is that my external disk is not even visible after installing ntfs-3g. I would appreciate any help you could give me. Josep M.
Sun Jul 11, 2010 18:27
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 09:24 Posts: 530
Re: Tuxera NTFS could not mount (on OS X)
Hi, If you need to quickly get back your NTFS drives you can just disable NTFS-3G from the NTFS-3G preference pane in System preferences (Apple menu->System preferences->NTFS-3G). It seems that MacFUSE is broken, or you're trying to use the software with an unsupported configuration such as the newer non-standard fully 64-bit kernel. If you think that MacFUSE is broken, then try the following procedure: There is an icon for MacFUSE in System preferences as well (or at least there should be one). Please click it and select 'Remove MacFUSE'. Then reinstall NTFS-3G (which will install MacFUSE with it if you don't deselect MacFUSE when installing). It's possible that this procedure fixes the problem. Regards, - Erik
Mon Jul 12, 2010 06:36
Hi. Thanks for the prompt response.
It seems that MacFUSE is broken, or you're trying to use the software with an unsupported configuration such as the newer non-standard fully 64-bit kernel.
I'm running my iMac in 64-bit mode. I did'nt know this was non-standard, though. Somewhere I have seen that there is a mixed mode so that apps that require 32-bit mode will run 32-bit and the OS as well as apps that can take advantage of the 64-bit processing will run in 64-bit mode. I haven't been able to figure out how to do this. As far as I can see the system gives me a choice between the two modes. It would be a bit unfortunate if you have to have a slower system in order to be able to use NTFS drives.
If you think that MacFUSE is broken, then try the following procedure: There is an icon for MacFUSE in System preferences as well (or at least there should be one). Please click it and select 'Remove MacFUSE'. Then reinstall NTFS-3G (which will install MacFUSE with it if you don't deselect MacFUSE when installing). It's possible that this procedure fixes the problem.
Thanks for the tip. One thing I'm not clear about. I installed MacFUSE separately because it was my impression that you needed to do that with the free NTFS-3G version (as opposed to the comercial Tuxera-NTFS version which installed MacFUSE automatically). So if I install ntfs-3g-2010.5.22-macosx.dmg, this takes care of installing MacFUSE for me? Again, thanks a lot for your help. JM
Mon Jul 12, 2010 10:16
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 09:24 Posts: 530
Re: Tuxera NTFS could not mount (on OS X)
Hi. Thanks for the prompt response.
It seems that MacFUSE is broken, or you're trying to use the software with an unsupported configuration such as the newer non-standard fully 64-bit kernel.
I'm running my iMac in 64-bit mode. I did'nt know this was non-standard, though. Somewhere I have seen that there is a mixed mode so that apps that require 32-bit mode will run 32-bit and the OS as well as apps that can take advantage of the 64-bit processing will run in 64-bit mode. I haven't been able to figure out how to do this. As far as I can see the system gives me a choice between the two modes. It would be a bit unfortunate if you have to have a slower system in order to be able to use NTFS drives.
This is a common misunderstanding. You do not have to do anything with your computer in order to do 64-bit computing and take advantage of the capabilities of your 64-bit processor. The stock kernel is a hybrid 32/64-bit kernel, fully capable of running 64-bit applications and giving them a 64-bit address space. The fully 64-bit kernel (RELEASE_X86_64) is to be used with systems that have more than 32 GiB of memory (the hybrid kernel cannot address more than 32 GiB), like the Xserve rack servers. For other systems it does not offer any signficant advantage (in general 64-bit code will use more resources because of the larger pointers needed, so it could even be slower) except perhaps in very special cases... We are working on bringing support for the fully 64-bit kernel to our products, but in fact most people shouldn't use it yet (it's mostly for server use at this time).
If you think that MacFUSE is broken, then try the following procedure: There is an icon for MacFUSE in System preferences as well (or at least there should be one). Please click it and select 'Remove MacFUSE'. Then reinstall NTFS-3G (which will install MacFUSE with it if you don't deselect MacFUSE when installing). It's possible that this procedure fixes the problem.
Thanks for the tip. One thing I'm not clear about. I installed MacFUSE separately because it was my impression that you needed to do that with the free NTFS-3G version (as opposed to the comercial Tuxera-NTFS version which installed MacFUSE automatically). So if I install ntfs-3g-2010.5.22-macosx.dmg, this takes care of installing MacFUSE for me?
Yes, both NTFS-3G and Tuxera NTFS for Mac come bundled with MacFUSE to make installation as easy as possible. Regards, - Erik
Mon Jul 12, 2010 10:26
Hi Erik and thanks a lot for your prompt and informative reply.
This is a common misunderstanding. You do not have to do anything with your computer in order to do 64-bit computing and take advantage of the capabilities of your 64-bit processor. The stock kernel is a hybrid 32/64-bit kernel, fully capable of running 64-bit applications and giving them a 64-bit address space. The fully 64-bit kernel (RELEASE_X86_64) is to be used with systems that have more than 32 GiB of memory (the hybrid kernel cannot address more than 32 GiB), like the Xserve rack servers. For other systems it does not offer any signficant advantage (in general 64-bit code will use more resources because of the larger pointers needed, so it could even be slower) except perhaps in very special cases...
OK, as you say the misunderstanding must be pretty common because I've read in many forums and sites (some of them looked like they were run by people who knew what they were talking about) that things run generally faster if you are in the 64-bit mode. I only have 8GB of ram so according to what you say I should be in the default 32-bit mode. But just see this sample of what I was talking about: http://macperformanceguide.com/SnowLeopard-64bit.html If you note, they do claim that 64-bit apps will run faster. I cannot find other links now where they claim that the whole system will in general faster and more efficient. Perhaps they were talking about previous versions of OS X and now things have improved? JM
Mon Jul 12, 2010 19:59
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 09:24 Posts: 530
Re: Tuxera NTFS could not mount (on OS X)
OK, as you say the misunderstanding must be pretty common because I've read in many forums and sites (some of them looked like they were run by people who knew what they were talking about) that things run generally faster if you are in the 64-bit mode. I only have 8GB of ram so according to what you say I should be in the default 32-bit mode. But just see this sample of what I was talking about: http://macperformanceguide.com/SnowLeopard-64bit.html If you note, they do claim that 64-bit apps will run faster. I cannot find other links now where they claim that the whole system will in general faster and more efficient. Perhaps they were talking about previous versions of OS X and now things have improved? JM
The main difference would be between 64-bit and 32-bit user space applications. CPU intensive applications are supposed to spend most of their time in user space so any difference in performance between kernels would be hard to notice. The comparison that you linked to confirms that only for very specialized applications there's any noticeable difference at all... but if you want to squeeze out that last 1-2% of a video rendering session you may be helped by the 64-bit kernel. There is a reason that Apple don't turn on the fully 64-bit kernel by default, and it's simply that they don't consider it necessary until the machine can support more than 32 GiB of memory. The hybrid kernel is more compatible with legacy software too, and any difference in performance is marginal, so for the vast majority of people it's the right choice at the moment... but yes we are planning a release that supports the fully 64-bit kernel, though no release date is known yet. Regards, - Erik
Mon Jul 12, 2010 20:54
OK dokey. I'll follow your advice, which sounds pretty sensible. I can always logon in 64-bit mode when I need to do those big rendering jobs. JM
Mon Jul 12, 2010 21:07
I didn't remember about this but Apple itself contributes to the confusion we were discussing. I went to change the mode back to 32-bits and I see a message that says 'When your computer is restarted, it will run the following version of the Mac OS X kernel: 32-bit (slower, uses less memory, better compatibility) 64-bit (faster, uses more memory, some older kernel extensions will not load)
Mon Jul 12, 2010 21:26
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 09:24 Posts: 530
Re: Tuxera NTFS could not mount (on OS X)
I didn't remember about this but Apple itself contributes to the confusion we were discussing. I went to change the mode back to 32-bits and I see a message that says 'When your computer is restarted, it will run the following version of the Mac OS X kernel: 32-bit (slower, uses less memory, better compatibility) 64-bit (faster, uses more memory, some older kernel extensions will not load)
Is that really a message printed by Apple? As far as I know there's no built in 'switching' feature in Mac OS X. You have to either edit the NVRAM settings, the boot config file, or press '6' and '4' while the computer is booting to get the fully 64-bit kernel if you are not using any third party 'switching' app.
Mon Jul 12, 2010 21:30
Is that really a message printed by Apple? As far as I know there's no built in 'switching' feature in Mac OS X. You have to either edit the NVRAM settings, the boot config file, or press '6' and '4' while the computer is booting to get the fully 64-bit kernel if you are not using any third party 'switching' app.
You are totally right. This message is from an app called SixtyFour Switcher. I just wasn't thinking when I said it was from Apple. JM
Mon Jul 12, 2010 22:42
I am running into the exact same problem on a stock hexacore Mac Pro I just bought. I don't even know how to switch the kernel between 32 and 64-bit modes, so it appears that Apple is now preinstalling kernels in 64-bit mode. What is the fix?
Sat Sep 18, 2010 07:08
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2007 09:24 Posts: 530
Re: Tuxera NTFS could not mount (on OS X)
Hi,
I am running into the exact same problem on a stock hexacore Mac Pro I just bought. I don't even know how to switch the kernel between 32 and 64-bit modes, so it appears that Apple is now preinstalling kernels in 64-bit mode. What is the fix?
The latest release candidate of Tuxera NTFS for Mac supports the fully 64-bit kernels. You can grab it from here: http://www.tuxera.com/products/tuxera-ntfs-for-mac/ We would love to have your feedback on how the driver works for you under the 64-bit kernel. If you would prefer not to run a 'release candidate', you can switch to the 32/64-bit hybrid kernel with a simple click of a button using an application called K64Enabler: http://timesoftware.free.fr/k64enabler/ I hope this helps. Regards, - Erik
Sat Sep 18, 2010 08:27
Page 1 of 1
[ 12 posts ]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Posted by Juno to NTFS for Mac on December 8th, 2017
Free download high compatibable NTFS driver below to fix Tuxera NTFS for Mac not mounting drive on macOS Catalina/Mojave/High Sierra.
Tuxera NTFS for Mac not mounting drive error is a problem that no one wants to experience. But this error is more and more common as there are more Mac users who use Tuxera NTFS for Mac. Specifically, this error happens when users try to mount NTFS drive on Mac with this program.
The current version of Tuxera NTFS for Mac is not compatible with some particular brand of NTFS drives. Actually, Tuxera NTFS for Mac is developed from a free open-source software named NTFS-3G. But as NTFS-3G is not officially supported by any company, so the compatibility of Tuxera NTFS for Mac is also been affected and is not high enough to cover all hard drive brands.
Fix Tuxera NTFS for Mac not mounting drive on macOS Catalina 10.15/Mojave 10.14/High Sierra 10.13
To fix Tuxera NTFS for Mac not mounting drive error, the easiest way is use a high compatible NTFS for macOS Catalina 10.15/Mojave 10.14/High Sierra 10.13 software. Here are two reliable NTFS driver for Mac, which are fully compatible with all hard drive brands.
Solution 1: NTFS Assistant
NTFS Assistant is a professional NTFS driver for macOS that can enable write to NTFS drive on macOS 10.14/10.13/10.12 and Mac OS X 10.11/10.10/10.9/10.8/10.7. It not only sales at a very low price, but also mounts NTFS drives with fast speed.
Guidance to download and use NTFS Assistant
Step 1: Download and install NTFS Assistant from App Store >>.
Tuxera Ntfs Could Not Mount /dev/disk1s1
Step 2: Download and installNTFS Assistant Helper >> to enable NTFS read-write access.
Step 3: Launch NTFS Assistant and connect our NTFS drive to Mac.
Tuxera Ntfs 2019 Crack
Solution 2: iBoysoft Drive Manager
iBoysoft Drive Manager is an easy-to-use Mac tool that can effectively mount NTFS drive as a regular drive with read-write mode. With it, we can easily write to NTFS drives on macOS 10.15/10.14/10.13/10.12 and Mac OS X 10.11/10.10/10.9/10.8.
Download
Aside from writing to NTFS drive on Mac, iBoysoft Drive Manager is also a wonderful tool to manage external drives and network drives. From its menu bar, we can mount and unmount external drives and network drives with a single click. With it, we only need to set up network drive at the first time it is connected to Mac and later it will be automatically mounted when needed in the future.
Tutorial to enable NTFS write support on macOS High Sierra with iBoysoft Drive Manager
Step 1: Download and install iBoysoft Drive Manager on Mac.
Step 2: Launch iBoysoft Drive Manager and connect NTFS drive to Mac.
Step 3: Write to NTFS drive after getting notified that it has been mounted successfully.
